Who is to blame for all of:China and Russia said that North Korea was acting out because the US and South Korea were doing war drills together.
On Monday, a meeting of the UN Security Council took place. (20 March). In the meantime, the US, China, and Russia argue about who is to blame for North Korea’s dozens of ballistic missile attacks and nuclear weapons.
Follow for more updates:newsydrone.com
On March 16, North Korea fired its biggest intercontinental ballistic missile, the Hwasong-17. The 15 people on the council met to talk about this. Since 2006, the UN has put bans on North Korea because of its nuclear and missile projects.
Russia and the US met each other again.
During the debate, China and Russia said that the US and South Korea’s joint military drills were baiting North Korea. The US, on the other hand, said that Beijing and Moscow were pushing North Korea to keep it from getting more sanctions. Was blamed. A senior UN official told the meeting that UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres is “deeply concerned” about the differences that have stopped the international community from moving on this issue.
Who is to blame for all of
Russia and China asked questions about the United States.
Anna Evstigneeva, Russia’s Deputy UN Ambassador, called the military action between the US and South Korea “unprecedented.” Geng Shuang, China’s Deputy UN Ambassador, asked if the military training between the US and South Korea were defensive. He said that the practice was making things worse.
Council members disagree on what to do about North Korea
Let us tell you that the group hasn’t agreed on how to deal with North Korea for a few years now. Russia and China have said that more sanctions won’t help, and the United States, Britain, and France, who have the power to block, agree. They want these kinds of measures to be less severe. Thomas-Greenfield said that if the UN sanctions were lifted, North Korea would have “no reason to follow Security Council resolutions.”
Russia also had questions about the scheme between the US and UK.
Russia and China once again raised nuclear concerns about a security deal called AUKUS, which would let Australia build a nuclear-powered submarine program with the US and UK. Both the US and the UK brushed off these worries and told the Council that AUKUS does not break the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
Britain’s Deputy UN Ambassador James Kariuki told the Council, “There is no comparison to AUKUS because North Korea’s illegal nuclear and ballistic missile programs break several Council resolutions.”